Massachusetts Foreclosure Ruling May Set Precedent for Large Banks
By Kyle Chezum Updated on 1/10/20111/10/11
On Friday, the Supreme Court in Massachusetts ruled that banks cannot foreclose on homes unless proof of ownership is clearly established. This is part of the issue at the core of the foreclosure crisis. Many banks packaged and sold mortgages as mortgage backed securities, technically transferring ownership of the mortgages to investors and in many cases destroying the paper trail needed to prove any ownership at all.
If the ruling in Massachusetts sets a precedent for the rest of the nation, the major financial practices of big banks may have to change or further litigation will result.
For full story, click here.
About The Author:
Kyle Chezum
My name is Kyle Chezum. I'm a Marketing Associate here at Lender411com. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thanks!.
-
What You Need To Know About Escrow
View More
-
President Obama Initiates Lower FHA Mortgage Insurance Premiums
View More
-
What is Quantitative Easing?
View More
-
The 5 New Mortgage and Housing Trends for Summer 2013
View More
-
Fannie Mae profitability skyrockets
View More
-
Foreclosure protections for more soldiers after lawmakers draft bill
View More
-
FHFA: HARP success follows low mortgage rates, February refinance volume strong
View More
-
Use of Mortgage Interest Deduction Depends on Where You Live
View More
-
HUD will sell 40,000 distressed loans in 2013
View More
-
Mortgage Principal Reduction Could Save Taxpayers $2.8 Billion
View More
-
Mortgage Applications Regain Traction after Sluggishness, Rates Continue to Fall
View More
-
HARP 3.0 Discussions Reveal Little Hope for HARP Update
View More
-
Home Prices Rise in February According to LPS Data
View More
-
Balancing Act: House Committee Hears Opposing Viewpoints Over Mortgage Interest Rate Deduction
View More
-
Near Record Low Mortgage Rates Buoy Housing Recovery
View More
Related Articles
Featured Lenders
RBS Citizens
Clifton Park, NY